The Political Shortcomings in Steven Pinker’s ‘Enlightenment Now’
Written on
Chapter 1: The Praise and Critique of Progress
In 2018, Bill Gates expressed high regard for Steven Pinker’s book, Enlightenment Now, noting its commendable portrayal of humanity's progress over recent centuries. Gates stated, “Enlightenment Now is not only the best book Pinker has written. It’s now my favourite book of all time.” While Pinker’s assertions may ring true for many in affluent nations, he neglects to acknowledge the significant disparities in progress across different regions and the reasons behind these inequalities.
This paragraph will result in an indented block of text, typically used for quoting other text.
Section 1.1: Insights and Limitations
Pinker’s work showcases moments of brilliance, celebrating human creativity, scientific advancements, and societal systems that enhance knowledge, health, and overall well-being. However, he overlooks the fact that not everyone globally is reaping the benefits of this progress. His political views align with mainstream capitalist ideologies, which many experts argue require reevaluation.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Neoliberal Perspective
Pinker’s neoliberal stance reflects a centrist viewpoint, arguing that living conditions have improved in developed nations over the centuries. While this observation is accurate, it is also quite basic and raises questions about the purpose of his extensive analysis. He does make a case for improving quality of life, a viewpoint not universally held, yet he spends excessive time stating the obvious, such as the benefits of hospitals in reducing mortality rates. His political analysis, often superficial, fails to adequately address global inequalities and the shortcomings of current capitalist frameworks, limiting his credibility as a political thinker in the 21st century.
Section 1.2: Economic Dynamics and Global Inequality
Pinker assumes that the world is on an upward trajectory without adequately discussing how global economic dynamics influence who benefits from this progress. His tendency to generalize about “people” as a uniform group hinders the recognition of diverse experiences among different populations. Such a methodological approach would be criticized by serious social scientists for its inadequacy.
Chapter 2: Environmental Concerns and Historical Context
Pinker also neglects the potentially disastrous environmental consequences of unchecked industrialization and consumerism. He seems to overlook warnings from thinkers like Karl Popper, who caution against projecting current trends into the future without considering their sustainability. Pinker’s optimistic outlook, while well-intentioned, may be dangerously naive, as it fails to address the risks of worsening conditions for many who are currently disadvantaged.
In the video Steven Pinker: Enlightenment Now, Pinker discusses the positive trends in human history and the role of enlightenment values in driving progress. However, the video also invites viewers to critically evaluate the implications of his arguments and the disparities that persist across the globe.
Chapter 3: The Dangers of Complacent Optimism
Pinker’s work, despite its admirable elements, promotes a dangerously complacent optimism about future outcomes for humanity. This perspective may inadvertently foster a lack of awareness regarding the economic disparities faced by millions today, as well as the risks posed by climate change and other systemic issues.
In the video Book Review: Enlightenment Now by Steven Pinker, the reviewer highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of Pinker's arguments, encouraging a balanced view of his optimistic claims against the backdrop of ongoing global challenges.
If you're interested in receiving my articles directly to your email, please follow this link to subscribe.