Chapter 1: The Government's Knowledge of Extraterrestrial Life

The question remains: Why is Congress not pushing for answers from the Pentagon and NASA, especially as these agencies hinder the discovery of potential extraterrestrial evidence? Who truly holds the reins of power in the United States?

The existence of UFOs is not merely a claim made by media outlets or individual researchers. It is substantiated by government documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, indicating that humanity possesses evidence suggesting UFOs may be of alien origin or not human. Pioneering investigators like Allen Hynek, Stanton Friedman, and Dr. John E. Mack represented the last wave of serious inquiry into this matter. One wonders whether any current scientist will rise to continue their legacy.

In an insightful interview on Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal, John Greenewald Jr. highlights a troubling trend: 100% of UFO photographic evidence has been denied in FOIA requests, including those made public since 2017. The latest footage presented by Kirkpatrick to the Senate and the NASA UFO committee was collected by the military, yet all sensitive data was omitted.

Why can't sensitive information simply be redacted?

It seems implausible that the government cannot modify the data to provide the public with the crucial evidence we seek. This refusal to be transparent raises concerns, especially as even members of Congress find themselves filing FOIA requests for data that should be readily available.

Where are the scientists advocating for the release of governmental evidence? The NASA committee appears to be selectively considering only civilian data, which is not a scientific approach. Cherry-picking requires an initial broader analysis to determine what constitutes substantial evidence.

Moreover, if Kirkpatrick admits that military data collection surpasses that of the public, are taxpayer dollars being wasted on this charade?

It's plausible that they have already encountered credible evidence, and their lack of transparency is deliberate. Alternatively, they may be so overwhelmed by the stigma surrounding UFOs that they fail to examine historical data, including government documents now accessible to civilians.

Thus, John Greenewald Jr. holds a wealth of civilian data. Is the NASA UFO committee engaging with him, or are they merely squandering time and taxpayer funds?

How much longer will the public tolerate the military and NASA's inefficiencies and pseudo-scientific endeavors disguised as legitimate committees?

You don’t require scientific validation to determine if the government has an extraterrestrial spacecraft hidden in Area 51.

Ben Rich, who served as the second director of Lockheed's Skunk Works from 1975 to 1991, is often dubbed the "father of stealth." He was instrumental in developing the F-117, the first production stealth aircraft, alongside various other classified projects. In a surprising deathbed confession in 2010, Rich reportedly acknowledged the reality of extraterrestrial UFO visitors and asserted that the U.S. military is capable of interstellar travel.

In 2017, Robert Bigelow stated that aliens are indeed present among us. Why then is he absent from the NASA UFO committee? Is it because he lacks a scientific background? Are the chosen scientists as selectively curated as the data they're reviewing?

Is Haim Eshed a scientist? Why isn't he part of the NASA UFO committee? Why hasn't he been interviewed? It raises concerns that those who have faced harassment for their scientific inquiries, like Dr. John E. Mack, may be experiencing similar treatment.

Why wasn't Dr. Gary Nolan invited to the NASA UFO committee? Can the panel engage with retired Commander and Top Gun pilot David Fravor? Retired U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich could join him! Though they have military backgrounds, Dr. Diana Walsh Pasulka has gathered significant intelligence in her research on civilian UFOs.

Can the panel consult her? To her credit, she would likely clarify when a topic exceeds her area of expertise, which paradoxically makes her an ideal candidate for the panel.

A comprehensive historical overview is essential for scientific progress, tracing back to Francis Bacon, the originator of the scientific method. Any scientific exploration of UFOs or aliens must consider the extensive historical context. Medicine, for instance, cannot effectively treat conditions without acknowledging symptoms; similarly, ignoring the historical context surrounding UFO phenomena could lead to incomplete understanding.

From a psychological perspective, as illustrated in Carl Jung's 1979 work Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies, we see a legitimate scientist wrestling with the UFO phenomenon. If we treat this phenomenon as a virus, it would represent an unprecedented contagion, infiltrating every corner of the globe in mere years.

Historically, UFO sightings surged following the first nuclear weapons test, suggesting a correlation between the two events. If they have existed long before, they may view our experimentation with weapons of mass destruction unfavorably.

This raises an important question: Does the refusal of the U.S. military to release information imply that UFOs advocate for peace, while the government does not?

While I do not mean to equate UFOs with a contagion, there are those at Skinwalker Ranch who propose the "Hitchhiker effect," suggesting that the phenomenon spreads from individuals who have encountered it to their communities.

If peace were more easily transmitted than war, we would have achieved it by now.

In Jung's exploration of this subject, he poses a profound question: If the phenomenon is archetypal, how does the human psyche resonate with it?

This is a question that NASA scientists have yet to confront. Their lack of inquiry stems from two main issues: first, their failure to conduct a thorough literature review, and second, the fear of opening Pandora's box to a range of Psi explanations that they have long sought to suppress.

Furthermore, if they reintroduce psychological models of archetypes and the collective unconscious, they would have to reconsider statements attributed to Ben Rich, who claimed that we possess the technology to bring ET home.

NUGGET FOUR: When asked about UFO propulsion, Rich quipped, "Let me ask you. How does ESP work?" The respondent suggested, "All points in time and space are connected?" Rich then affirmed, "That's how it works!"

This indicates that science has neglected to study non-physical phenomena, which could lead to more advancements in a decade than in all previous centuries combined.

If science were to seriously investigate UFOs and align its technologies with humanity's highest ideals, we might witness free energy, a healthier environment, and a renewed focus on the humanities.

Chapter 2: Recent Developments in UFO Research

The Pentagon's 63-page report on evidence of alien existence has sparked significant debate, as it challenges previous claims and emphasizes the need for transparency in governmental UFO investigations.

In UFO: The Inside Story of the US Government's Search for Alien Life Here—and Out There, experts delve into the government's ongoing pursuit of understanding extraterrestrial phenomena, shedding light on the complexities involved.