Sometimes it’s worth considering that conspiracy theories might hold some truth.

You may find yourself wanting to discuss UFOs with friends or family, only to be met with skepticism. The moment you mention “cover up,” you can almost feel their eyes roll and the condescending smiles forming. This dismissive attitude is a direct result of decades of psychological manipulation executed by covert factions within the Pentagon and the CIA, affecting not just the American populace, but global perceptions as well.

No segment of society, apart from those entrenched in secrecy within governmental agencies, was spared from the decision to clandestinely shape the narrative surrounding UFOs. As we navigate the slow and often frustrating process of disclosure, the fundamental question of why such disclosure is necessary often gets overlooked.

Many avoid discussing the UFO cover-up because society has conditioned them to dismiss such beliefs as ludicrous. This has led to a subtle form of mind control.

Here are some prevalent sentiments surrounding the topic:

• "Sure, the Pentagon acknowledges UAPs exist, but I refuse to believe they've been lying for 75 years. That’s just conspiracy nonsense."
• "If there were any real threats, the authorities would alert us. A scientist in 1969 concluded there was nothing to worry about. I trust science, which is never wrong."
• "Eventually, UFOs will be explained away as mundane phenomena. Only attention-seekers or frauds report them."
• "I won’t waste time on declassified documents. Governments can’t keep secrets."
• "Trust the military and intelligence agencies. Those brave individuals wouldn’t betray us. That’s too un-American."
• "People who discuss UFOs are just delusional. The idea of a cover-up is just a natural extension of their fantasies. I don’t believe in aliens."
• "Let’s play the X-Files theme and have a laugh. Now, delete my contact info."

Choosing the blue pill is often the most comforting option.

There’s no shame in opting for the blue pill; it’s widely recognized as government-issued.

The primary means of controlling the UFO discourse has been ridicule—an inexpensive yet effective tactic. For those who had personal experiences with UFOs, remaining silent in the name of patriotism became the fallback. More drastic measures, such as intimidation or threats, were also employed to silence persistent inquiries.

The UFO cover-up can be traced back to the disinformation campaign initiated by Brigadier General Roger Ramey during a 1947 press conference, where he denied that the Army Air Force had recovered a crashed flying saucer in Roswell, New Mexico. The narrative of UFOs being ridiculous was established from the outset.

Aside: The first rule of executing a cover-up is to create disinformation. Diverting attention to other, equally plausible conspiracy theories can effectively suppress curiosity about the real issue.

Many intriguing questions remain. The ongoing UFO cover-up serves as one example of how public perception can be manipulated.

## Financial Considerations Are Secondary

People will willingly contribute their efforts for free if they believe it serves their interests.

The quest for perfect mind control has been a governmental goal since the advent of brainwashing. While torture may yield immediate results, it’s often unreliable. Encouraging individuals to willingly engage in a cause typically leads to more favorable outcomes than coercive tactics. Ultimately, you don’t win over minds by oppressing them.

Ideology provides a robust platform, as humans naturally seek belonging and approval. Appeals to patriotism or religious duty serve as ideological motivators, compelling compliance with social norms for desired behavior. Cults may disguise their intentions with fancy language, but their ultimate goal is dominance by a select few.

Psychological control systems are more of an art than a science. While propaganda can be effective, some discerning individuals will see through attempts to mislead them. Consequently, considerable efforts were made in the 20th century to develop more reliable methods of mind control than mere suggestion.

Fearing that the Soviets would gain an edge, a faction within the U.S. government took the initiative. Under Allen Dulles, the CIA employed chemist Sidney Gottlieb to explore mind control for national security purposes. This led to the continuation of research initiated by the Nazis and Japanese during World War II.

Dulles was convinced that the Soviets aimed to brainwash Americans to create a domestic fifth column. While he publicly denounced "Soviet brain perversion techniques" as abhorrent, he secretly funded extensive research into the use of psychedelics for mind control.

Gottlieb also experimented with hypnosis, electroshock, and other controversial methods, all under Project MKUltra, which spanned two decades. The project had two main objectives:

1. To disrupt an individual’s cognitive state, which MKUltra achieved through experiments on “volunteers” (often coerced), including those in prisons and mental institutions. The full extent of these unethical activities remains hidden due to the destruction of most records ordered by a later CIA Director, Richard Helms.
2. To discover ways to instill a “new mind.” While Gottlieb’s team excelled at debilitating individuals’ ability to think independently, they were largely unsuccessful in achieving their ultimate goal of conditioning these subjects to think as the CIA desired.

Aw, surely you can’t expect me to believe the government did that. Regardless, you can’t make me look because I don’t want to accept it.

There are likely many other biological or technological initiatives aimed at perfecting mind control that remain largely unknown. For instance, Russia conducted experiments beaming microwaves into the American Embassy during the "Moscow Signal" era, and now we must consider the implications of Havana Syndrome.

It’s troubling, yet not entirely unexpected, to find the effects of UFO encounters and human concerns about mind control intersecting.

## A New Lens on the Old

Change the terminology, and you control the narrative.

A new term has emerged in the conversation about mind control: psychotronic. While not entirely new, it originated in the Czech Republic to describe parapsychological effects and has also been associated with forms of electronic harassment such as the Moscow Signal.

The first meaning is often dismissed as pseudoscience, a term favored by conventional academics when confronted with investigations that challenge established frameworks. The second definition suggests an electromagnetic interference with brain processes, leading to altered mental states. Interestingly, both interpretations appear relevant to the Pentagon’s concerns regarding UFOs.

In an unclassified briefing document from the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), the issue of “psychotronic weapons” is prioritized. Among the list of potential threats to national security is the ability for adversaries to manipulate both physical and cognitive environments.

Fortunately, the Department of Defense claims to be well-prepared to address this looming threat:

• The DoD has previously conducted similar experiments, likely referring to the earlier Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP), which explored UFOs and phenomena at Skinwalker Ranch.
• They maintain “relationships with renowned subject matter experts,” hinting at a network of knowledgeable individuals who have been investigating these issues for some time.
• The DoD oversees “several facilities where activities have been detected,” suggesting that their monitoring extends beyond just Skinwalker Ranch.

The briefing even implies that they have some insights into the underlying mechanisms.

“What was previously labeled ‘phenomena’ is now framed as quantum physics.”

Don’t worry, we have equations for everything!

## The Dangers of Psychotronics

The goal of psychotronics is to involuntarily alter your mind.

Numerous accounts document cognitive changes in individuals following UFO encounters. Reports include loss of consciousness, paralysis while remaining aware, telepathic impressions, missing time, memory suppression, and altered states of consciousness that can induce euphoria or numbness to pain.

Some individuals experience radical shifts in their worldview post-encounter, leading to profound changes in their understanding of existence.

Recently, there has been increased dialogue about the potential physiological effects on those who come too close to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). This raises the question of whether these impacts on human consciousness are accidental side effects of UAP technology rather than intentional outcomes.

Moreover, there is concern that what we perceive as UAP may not reflect reality but rather a projection designed to mislead us, masking a fundamentally different experience.

Inside the Department of Defense, there is recognition of the potential weaponization of these phenomena. For instance, what if an individual could be rendered incapable of recognizing a missile launch button? On a more direct level, consider the possibility of an entire army being paralyzed, unable to take action.

Or perhaps, they could be led to believe that they have friends among potential enemies.

“Let me share the wonders of the Galactic Federation…”

The military implications of psychotronics are profound, as the focus of consciousness is paramount in achieving anything in the physical world. If perfected, psychotronics could render traditional weaponry obsolete without a single shot fired.

Psychotronics could enslave you without your awareness, proving far more effective than manipulating social media.

## Exploring Possible Mechanisms

Should we feel guilty for exploring how psychotronic control might be feasible?

Caution to sensitive readers: The scientific community has largely neglected to delve into the complexities of human consciousness. Consciousness itself emerges from this foundational nature, which is essential for scientific inquiry. Thus, our discussion of potential psychotronic mechanisms may seem unconventional.

Sir Roger Penrose, a distinguished British mathematician and physicist, along with Dr. Stuart Hameroff, a respected anesthesiologist, propose a quantum basis for consciousness through the Penrose-Hameroff hypothesis of “orchestrated objective reduction (Orch OR).” This theory posits that consciousness arises from quantum effects in the microtubules of brain neurons.

To paraphrase Hameroff:

“In Orch OR, quantum computations occur within microtubules during integration phases in neurons, which are connected and synchronized, allowing for entanglement among many neurons. These computations culminate in Penrose’s concept of objective reduction, linking conscious experiences to fundamental spacetime geometry.”

Uh-huh. Spacetime geometry. I get it; everything is interconnected.

Simply put, the quantum structure of the human brain acts as a calculator that interprets the external physical world, producing consciousness as a form of awareness within an ever-evolving material landscape.

One of the defining characteristics of UFOs is their ability to perform maneuvers that defy our current understanding of physics. For instance, UAP are reported to transition from altitudes of 80,000 feet to sea level in less than a second, forces that would obliterate any biological life as we know it. They are also observed to move at remarkable speeds without creating sonic booms or causing disturbances in water.

Clearly, UAP demonstrate an advanced understanding of spatial manipulation beyond our current capabilities, and their technology appears to influence human consciousness.

The Pentagon briefing suggests they believe this technology operates on a quantum level. Considering the cognitive effects associated with UFOs, and reflecting on the Penrose-Hameroff hypothesis, one could surmise that UAP might possess the ability to influence or alter consciousness in sentient beings at will.

Do you think this is what the Pentagon envisions as a potential weapon?

## Keep Your Eyes Open

Just because you haven’t observed something doesn’t mean it isn’t real.

Commentators suggest that a UAP race is underway, with countries like Russia and China intensifying their research to gain an advantage over the Phenomenon. America, for its part, seems to have engaged in this pursuit since the 1950s.

While the allure of anti-gravity technology and limitless energy sources is enticing, the fundamental human goal remains the same: to exert control over one another. The Pentagon recognizes a grave risk—should psychotronics fall into the wrong hands, we could lose our autonomy.

Sidebar: In a previous article, I recounted my personal encounter with psychotronic technology, which I share here for your amusement:

• “In the 1990s, remote viewing gained popularity, and I naturally excelled at it. Engaging with others online, we aimed to see if our observations aligned. While our reports varied, there was one instance where all doubt was erased.”
• “Without setting a target, I focused on Area 51, which turned out to be a mistake. I found myself immobilized, unable to return to my body. It was terrifying. I observed two men at a console—one in uniform, the other in a jumpsuit. They were aware of my presence. The officer said, ‘Let him go, it’s just another sleepwalker.’ In an instant, I was back in my body. A few weeks later, a colleague at Hewlett-Packard, who had also attempted to remote view Area 51, recounted a similar experience, including the same officer’s words.”

The Pentagon may indeed possess insights from their 75-year history of concealing the true nature of UFOs. They could have acquired technology from recovered artifacts or developed new capabilities. The most alarming possibility is that they might be nearing the achievement of perfect mind control.

In that case, the need for a cover-up could become obsolete.

Follow up on UFOs and psychotronics: