Chapter 1: The Leadership Industry's Illusions

As a blogger focusing on corporate ideologies, attitudes, and the ennui prevalent in the business realm, one might assume I delve deep into incisive critiques of business literature. However, the truth is somewhat different. While I engage with such material occasionally, much of it lacks intrigue. Nevertheless, I've come across a few books worth discussing, particularly two that critique leader behavior and the consulting sector.

The first book worth mentioning is Jeffrey Pfeffer's Leadership BS. Pfeffer is unimpressed by the leadership industry, including its plethora of books, seminars, conferences, TEDx Talks, and academic programs. He challenges the industry's notions of inspiration and moral elevation, advocating instead for insights derived from social scientific literature that, in his opinion, offer a more accurate depiction of actual leadership behaviors.

Pfeffer highlights a significant gap between the industry's ideals and scientific findings regarding leadership. While the former promotes values like honesty, authenticity, trust, and strong relationships, the latter reveals that leaders often engage in the opposite behaviors.

This discrepancy raises important questions about why real-world leaders diverge from industry teachings. At times, Pfeffer posits that dishonesty and inauthenticity may contribute to a company's success; at other moments, he suggests these traits benefit leaders individually rather than the organizations they represent. The latter perspective is particularly intriguing, especially for readers who approach these discussions from a critical viewpoint, as it highlights systemic flaws within capitalism.

Though Pfeffer offers some suggestions to better align leaders' interests with those of their companies, he only scratches the surface of deeper issues. He briefly acknowledges concepts like employee ownership but leaves many critical areas unexplored.

Chapter 2: A Critical Examination of the Consulting Sector

In a similar vein, Mariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington's The Big Con takes a stark stance against the consulting industry. Their critique is not rooted in political or moral grounds, but instead focuses on the industry's failure to deliver on its promises.

Mazzucato and Collington systematically dismantle the consulting sector, arguing that it not only fails to provide genuine value but also actively undermines the internal capabilities of both private enterprises and government entities. They introduce the concept of the "big con," where consultants create a façade of value delivery, substituting it for actual results.

According to their analysis, the consulting industry deceives clients by projecting confidence, relying on recycled ideas, and producing low-quality research. This tactic plays into managerial insecurities, leading organizations to believe in the limited capabilities of consultants.

But the impact of this deception is far-reaching: it erodes the strategic capabilities of both government and private sectors. Once upon a time, governments provided their own services, and companies sourced innovative ideas internally. Now, they outsource these essential functions to consulting firms, and when problems arise from consultant advice, they find themselves unable to rectify the issues independently, relying on yet another consulting firm for solutions.

Ultimately, Mazzucato and Collington present a compelling critique, although they occasionally lean too heavily on isolated scandals within individual consulting firms rather than addressing the broader landscape. Nonetheless, their portrayal of the consulting industry's shortcomings raises important questions about the actions that governments and corporations should take moving forward.

N.B.

This article contains affiliate marketing links.